Acknowledge a fee increase is necessary and long overdue. I do not agree with the seemingly perpetual allowance to yearly COLA without notification/review/consideration of registrants. I have been a MRIT for 30+ and in leadership for over 20 of them. I do not agree with the comparison chart provided as you either neglect or outright ignore the wage comparison of the HRPs you did post alongside our profession. That is just plain shady as many of those professions earn significantly more than our own. You should also benchmark across the country against those provinces who are regulated and draw comparison of wages, number of MRITs to calculate cost per registrant. Is the college in debt? Running a deficit? If so when did it start? And how much? Or is it a projected future value? Many of us also do not understand the decision to go 100% virtual while still paying rent in downtown Toronto. Going virtual would have costed money to do so. Assuming the options were costed, if virtual was cost effective, why are you not sharing that? Was that decision based on the assumption you could escape the lease and or rent to others? If so, that is relying on funding not guaranteed which is poor business. With the massive increase in registrants for ultrasound, you should also be transparent as to how many additional paid staff was hired and in what roles. Much of the committee work is done by volunteers whether public appointed members and or MRITs who have volunteered their time to participate. Why as well are you not willing to hear registrants openly? Town hall? Something interactive? Why are you unwilling to engage those that fund your existence? Hiding behind virtual meetings only held during daytime hours when most work does not add to your credibility but reduces it and encourages negative feelings towards our college and the people who lead it. You do not even offer to record and post them for viewing later. It is important to be regulated 100% and as much as your mandate is to protect the public, it also shouldn't be metaphorically atop a mountain fortress inaccessible to those who fund the effort. As for the stepped increases, I would suggest dividing them equally over the years with a potential year skipped to allow us a reprieve. Overall the total is the same which is really a tough hit for many whose wages have not appreciated at the same rate as your fees will increase. I do implore you to be more transparent and engaged with your registrants. In not doing so and with the fees increase, you will encourage an underground technologist economy especially in the private environment who will pay wages well below appropriate levels for unregistered technologists who cannot afford to absorb this increase alongside their own cost of living for everyday life. Be thoughtful. Be considerate. Be transparent. Despite your mandate, you do represent us. Be better and do right by us.